Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '19 at 01:31
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45 5,882 User benchmarks, average bench 51% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 96.1 1-Core 82.5 2-Core 150 68% 110 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 242 33% 246 Pts	64-Core 251 16% 251 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (84^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 70.7 Reflection 72.1 Parallax 64.6 58% 69.1 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 73.8 60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 239 238 246 246 246 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	84.5% Excellent	Read 258 Write 244 Mixed 246 SusWrite 241 56% 247 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 50.6 166% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 165 124% 165 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 580GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 89.2 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 88.9 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX 8GB 262 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 16.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 15 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 53.8 74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	13x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 500 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	3x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16