PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H87 Performance (all builds) |
Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130703 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 28 '19 at 09:15 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 93% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
21.8%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 49 58 57 54 58 MB/s
|
72.7%
Very good
|
|||
SAMSUNG UFD 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.9 6.5 6.4 6.6 6.8 MB/s
|
6.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 65x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 63x |
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 53x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 42x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 37x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $421 |