Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120717
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 08:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 121
57% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
AMD(1002 2543) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13.1
12% 13.1 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 151 157 162 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 152
Mixed 109
SusWrite 147
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3250310CS 250GB-$33
144GB free
Firmware: 3.ACD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 97 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 98.5
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 95.4
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3250824AS Q 250GB
119GB free
Firmware: 3.BQK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 52 51 52 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 61
Mixed 37
SusWrite 51.7
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 36%
ADATA HV100 1TB
83GB free, PID a42a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 62
Mixed 18
SusWrite 67.7
68% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.5
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback