| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150323 |
| Uptime | 2.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 08 '19 at 23:02 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.7%
Good
|
57% 92.2 Pts
|
37% 306 Pts
|
24% 387 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.2%
Above average
|
52% 69.7 fps
|
50% 62.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 136 138 137 135 138 MB/s
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
83% 370 MB/s
|
163% 54.8 MB/s
|
196% 262 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 131 134 146 120 MB/s
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
77% 106 MB/s
|
101% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
440GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 140 137 138 138 MB/s
|
77.9%
Very good
|
84% 114 MB/s
|
142% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.4%
Average
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
50% 80.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 897 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 441x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 214x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $630 |