Cirrascale GB5470XL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCirrascale GB5470XL  (all builds)
MotherboardGIGABYTE GA-7PESH4
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140321
Uptime131.7 Days
Run DateMar 11 '19 at 20:11
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 50
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 162
53% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 525
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 1208
75% 1208 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 293 292 291 294 283 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 427
Write 330
Mixed 291
SusWrite 292
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 34.4
118% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 149
139% 210 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$231
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 143 142 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 144
Write 158
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 140
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
302% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback