Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161027
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '19 at 12:57
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 186 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 150 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 37.1 29% 33.1 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 34.8 Splatting 33.9 29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 8.2 47 8.2 31 17 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.2% Poor	Read 212 Write 97.3 Mixed 104 SusWrite 34.7 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 4.3 25% 8.9 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 33.8 DQ Mixed 39.8 38% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 22GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 74 103 117 117 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 21.3 Write 51.9 Mixed 20 SusWrite 96.9 34% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 53% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GLJF62F-DA---------- 2x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.5% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 13.5 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	49x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	36x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	24x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	27x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	20x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16