Today's hottest deals

CDM DQ67SW-R01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCDM DQ67SW-R01  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 10:17
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$71
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 171
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 335
37% 293 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 2
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.22
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 144 137 141 141 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 485
Mixed 303
SusWrite 168
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 53.4
190% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 183
185% 301 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%
Crucial_CT525MX3 525GB
243GB free
Firmware: R060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 234 177 185 189 223 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 403
Write 478
Mixed 288
SusWrite 234
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 42
141% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 285
224% 311 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW-R01 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: CDM DQ67SW-R01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback