Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181205
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 14:39
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-6950X-$1,000
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
SC Int 119
SC Float 130
SC Mixed 124
99% 124 Pts
QC Int 470
QC Float 510
QC Mixed 492
111% 490 Pts
MC Int 1,424
MC Float 1,642
MC Mixed 1,545
230% 1,537 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti-$1,100
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (94 fps cap detected)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 93.9
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 94.3
29% 94.3 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 94.2
40% 94.3 fps
Poor: 89%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 242%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$268
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 772 773 781 777 779 768 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1571
Write 856
Mixed 672
SusWrite 775
215% 969 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 57.9
224% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 373
360% 590 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 210%
Great: 240%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$600
278GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 386 388 380 383 383 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 456
Mixed 409
SusWrite 384
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60.4
190% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 312
246% 342 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%
Seagate ST12000DM0007-2GR116 12TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 227 226 227 227 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 122%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$207
2TB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 162 149 163 154 155 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 90%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$294
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 166 166 167 169 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 82
SusWrite 168
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
330% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 113%
ASMT 2105 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 102 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 160
Write 150
Mixed 81
SusWrite 100
160% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.4
237% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB-$530
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 63.3
MC Write 62
MC Mixed 56.2
173% 60.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 22
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 151%
Great: 151%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 3,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $1,803
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $101
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $140Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback