Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181004
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 63.7 1-Core 127 2-Core 255 79% 149 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 1,004 89% 754 Pts	64-Core 2,556 158% 2,556 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 120 Parallax 105 92% 113 fps	MRender 98.8 Gravity 106 Splatting 85.9 78% 96.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2279 794 796 796 797 801 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 2,542 Write 2372 Mixed 1,846 SusWrite 1,044 437% 1,951 MB/s	4K Read 60.4 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 84.3 274% 94.9 MB/s	DQ Read 987 DQ Write 783 DQ Mixed 910 674% 893 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 355%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 112GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 158 168 157 158 153 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 452 Write 161 Mixed 196 SusWrite 160 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 23.4 88% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 62.8 DQ Mixed 101 94% 151 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 776GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 97.2 Write 2.8 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 2.4 22% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 568GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 67 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 74.3 Write 75.7 Mixed 45 SusWrite 66.8 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 350GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 113 114 116 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 158 Write 106 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 113 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,694 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 23GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 60.2 Write 59.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 60.9 70% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 44%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 145 144 145 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 136 Write 143 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 144 175% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 1,149 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 77GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 43 38 36 38 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 164 Write 67.8 Mixed 77 SusWrite 44.3 103% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 129% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB 1,876 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	MC Read 51.7 MC Write 55.6 MC Mixed 52.1 152% 53.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 20.8 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 127%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	28x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	29x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	14x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	11x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x8GBCorsairBench 113%, 87 samples	5x
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 89%, 5,810 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $1,880

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16