PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock P67 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120424 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 21 '19 at 22:49 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 180 179 196 223 215 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
186GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 106 108 106 109 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
102GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 88 89 89 MB/s
|
50%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR3 1600G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 213x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 45x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 46x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 32x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $620 |