Toshiba QOSMIO X75

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemToshiba QOSMIO X75  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 14:39
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%
CPU Throttled 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 45.7
31% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 83.6
8-Core 119
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 1.38
1% 6.62 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 0.09
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 31 45 36 43 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 101
Write 98.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 43
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
466GB free
Firmware: GH2OA900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 118 117 117 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 118
64% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QOSMIO X75 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback