IBM 49Y6498

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	IBM 49Y6498 (all builds)
Memory	44.6 GB free of 56 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090820
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '19 at 09:24
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5506 633 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46% Average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 81.9 38% 60.6 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 394 33% 287 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 130 126 126 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 114 Write 119 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 128 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 362GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 83 82 85 74 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 79.1 Write 85.4 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 82 50% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 43% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 63%
External USB3.0 2TB 286 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1TB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 28 29 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 29.3 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 28.5 23% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 7.2 1,244% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 95%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 4.4 18 7.6 18 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 54.4 Write 19.1 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 12.8 21% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7x8GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 7 of 16 slots used 56GB DIMM Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.3% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 49Y6498 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: IBM 49Y6498

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

IBM 49Y6498

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: IBM 49Y6498

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)