PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw6600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A9Ch |
Memory | 17.2 GB free of 20.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120920 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 26 '19 at 14:05 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3663) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 119 123 124 107 89 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72
119GB free
Firmware: MS06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 64 64 64 64 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72
128GB free
Firmware: MS06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 73 73 73 73 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 53GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 442 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 569 samples | 15x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 46%, 705 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $139 |