Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 18:01
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 126
60% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 410
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 69.7
60% 72 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 68.6
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB-$109
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JTRA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 133 159 162 196 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 422
Write 196
Mixed 280
SusWrite 159
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 30.5
94% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 127
71% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 107%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 146 148 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 152
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 148
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 100%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$91
804GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 141 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 142
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback