PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z270-A (all builds) |
Memory | 23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170723 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Apr 02 '19 at 05:40 |
Run Duration | 303 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
35GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 275 201 212 217 261 MB/s
|
90.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
387GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 283 200 213 217 273 MB/s
|
86.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.2 63 11 22 38 MB/s
|
21.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 142 141 151 138 169 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
|||
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
635GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 58 58 57 58 66 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 3,696x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 1,438x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 613x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1,147x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 864x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 810x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $670 |