Koloe X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5667
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 67
2-Core 134
62% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 335
37% 293 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 18.4
15% 17.3 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 20.1
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 231 233 247 240 248 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.3% Very good
Read 260
Write 249
Mixed 232
SusWrite 230
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 37.6
125% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 176
138% 191 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 118%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
119GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 29.9
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 29.7
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 66%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB
186GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 28.4
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 15.5
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 100%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 29.1
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 15.5
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 MXIC 25L8005 41GB
1600, 33 MHz
8192, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback