Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,768 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 144 59% 97.7 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 416 40% 331 Pts	64-Core 527 33% 527 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB 750 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 136 131 140 139 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.8% Average	Read 250 Write 140 Mixed 169 SusWrite 137 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 18.3 60% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 96.7 DQ Write 62.8 DQ Mixed 74.5 57% 78 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 72%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 156GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 50 50 52 50 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 52.7 Write 51.7 Mixed 39 SusWrite 50.9 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-YH9 4x4GB 399 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 30.7 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 10 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16