Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '19 at 10:37
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	94%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 58 1-Core 131 2-Core 231 75% 140 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 596 53% 447 Pts	64-Core 861 53% 861 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F07) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 109 Parallax 110 58% 96.8 fps	MRender 81.3 Gravity 85.9 Splatting 53 58% 73.4 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 418GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 212 196 154 169 146 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.1% Below average	Read 145 Write 107 Mixed 125 SusWrite 169 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 13.7 52% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 142 104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 97GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 507 507 438 471 417 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 384 Write 756 Mixed 414 SusWrite 456 114% 503 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 25.4 82% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 655 DQ Write 501 DQ Mixed 661 472% 606 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 22GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 66 57 41 37 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 176 Write 131 Mixed 134 SusWrite 81.8 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 16.5 52% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 99.4 86% 130 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 108%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 139 146 143 145 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 111 Write 100 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 139 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB 1,274 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3.5TB free Firmware: MPAOA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 105 103 104 108 101 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 104 Write 95.3 Mixed 58 SusWrite 103 66% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 19.7 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,617x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,478x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,143x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	683x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	579x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	481x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	382x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16