Lenovo 42363P9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 42363P9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42363P9
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180604
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateApr 21 '19 at 10:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 169
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 222
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21D0) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.59
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.48
2% 2.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 300 296 301 301 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 454
Write 220
Mixed 324
SusWrite 266
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 32
102% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 32.3
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3S1333M/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback