Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	13.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '19 at 05:46
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 74.1 1-Core 113 2-Core 226 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 688 67% 550 Pts	64-Core 891 55% 891 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB; msi CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 67.3 Reflection 69 Parallax 94.5 55% 76.9 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 68.4 Splatting 55.6 52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 56%
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.8% Average	Lighting 54.5 Reflection 66.8 Parallax 80.5 44% 67.3 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 57.7 Splatting 55.4 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 14GB free Firmware: 2CV102HA SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 83 81 81 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 250 Write 83.2 Mixed 115 SusWrite 81.1 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 11.4 80% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 77.4 DQ Mixed 78.7 68% 103 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 44%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 77 149 162 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 676 Write 323 Mixed 377 SusWrite 139 84% 379 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 23.7 91% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 39.3 DQ Mixed 53.7 51% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 144%
Mushkin ECO2 SMI 512GB-$80 1,273 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 14GB free Firmware: N1007C Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 494 Write 254 Mixed 4.5 54% 251 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 31.9 82% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 97%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 190GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 64 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 65.2 Write 66.3 Mixed 74 SusWrite 64.8 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 65%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$48 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 14GB free Firmware: 3.CHF SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 25 0 0 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 15 Mixed 26 SusWrite 20.6 18% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 42%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 137GB free Firmware: AX001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 93 84 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	49% Average	Read 79.7 Write 79 Mixed 31 SusWrite 91 51% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FARG BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FARG BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.9% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 27.1 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 23.8 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $734

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)