Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181227
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '19 at 08:37
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Memory 82.5 1-Core 149 2-Core 291 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 986 95% 785 Pts	64-Core 1,535 95% 1,535 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 165 Parallax 147 123% 154 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 155 Splatting 107 100% 124 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2768) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 31 Parallax 38.6 27% 34.3 fps	MRender 42 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 34.4 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 1407 1510 1531 1519 1520 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 1,438 Write 1,515 Mixed 1,064 SusWrite 1,493 311% 1,378 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 68.7 228% 81.5 MB/s	DQ Read 962 DQ Write 921 DQ Mixed 323 412% 735 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 282%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 1.5TB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 1432 1423 1413 1427 1445 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 1,468 Write 1512 Mixed 1,070 SusWrite 1,430 309% 1,370 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 70.1 236% 84.2 MB/s	DQ Read 972 DQ Write 914 DQ Mixed 318 410% 735 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 282%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 18,655 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.1% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 20.2 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 19.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 123%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,319x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,138x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,085x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,047x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	812x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	686x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	511x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	508x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	467x

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $911

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16