Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140709
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '19 at 15:45
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150-$42 36,627 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 100 2-Core 174 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 278 37% 278 Pts	64-Core 277 17% 277 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 4.16 0% 2.46 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.98 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK2060GSC 200GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: TP113W SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 26 28 31 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 40.7 Write 45.9 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 29 24% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 29%
Samsung G2 Portable 320GB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 6GB free, PID 6032 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 27 28 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 17 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 27.2 30% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 21%
Maxell External USB 3.0 500GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 29GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 107 93 98 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 99.1 112% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 1x4GB 4,897 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 8.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H81M-HD3 Builds (Compare 928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD3 - $79

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	155x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	102x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	94x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	113x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	65x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	51x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	24x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $316

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16