ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP p6790uk

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP p6790uk (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB6
Memory	3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '19 at 21:12
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2300 19,722 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 150 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 302 40% 301 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.09% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 5.92 Parallax 4.31 4% 5.08 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 3.52 4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.09% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c55 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 372 366 369 369 372 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 398 Write 362 Mixed 322 SusWrite 362 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 27.9 98% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 171 133% 177 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 99%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 94 97 95 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54% Above average	Read 93.1 Write 94.1 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 94.7 64% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 55%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 689GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 17 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 28.4 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 3x2GB 347 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 13.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 13.4 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback