Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 149
55% 93 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 454
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 68.2
52% 67.6 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 62
Splatting 55.7
51% 64 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 301 293 295 276 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 449
Write 412
Mixed 358
SusWrite 286
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 37.2
121% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 207
154% 203 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
118GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 384 382 377 379 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 449
Write 412
Mixed 370
SusWrite 361
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 38.3
124% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 210
157% 209 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
271GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 372 333 322 328 316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 449
Write 413
Mixed 384
SusWrite 323
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 38.3
124% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 202
151% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback