PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150212 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 29 '19 at 17:14 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 301 293 295 276 288 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
118GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 384 382 377 379 380 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
271GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 372 333 322 328 316 MB/s
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |