Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Alienware Aurora R7 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0VDT73
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 09 '19 at 14:08
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 83.8 1-Core 136 2-Core 262 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 790 78% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,070 66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.17 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.1% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 146 Parallax 88.7 109% 123 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 89 Splatting 62.9 59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: AADA4106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 212 222 213 187 193 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 122 Write 200 Mixed 374 SusWrite 214 52% 228 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 96.2 4K Mixed 37.9 138% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 398 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 288 236% 339 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 193%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 439GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 408 414 445 446 446 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 440 Mixed 380 SusWrite 434 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 48.3 165% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 352 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.7 4.5 3.8 4.7 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.65% Terrible	Read 25.7 Write 6.3 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.2 11% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 2.1 99% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.65% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown XRMWRN-HYA 2x16GB 368 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 24 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 17.1 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	841x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	163x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	153x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 8,965 samples	551x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 9,471 samples	548x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,858 samples	491x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $633

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16