Asus X705NA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus X705NA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705NA
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '19 at 10:38
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Memory 44.8 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 91.7 36% 61.3 Pts	4-Core 92.6 8-Core 90.3 12% 91.4 Pts	64-Core 91.9 6% 91.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1A20) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 3.3 2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 260 273 230 138 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 356 Write 300 Mixed 286 SusWrite 217 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 22.5 75% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 145 107% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 94%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 1,557 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 58GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 17 15 18 17 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 30.4 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 16.6 34% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.3 151% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LS1KDGR/4G 1x4GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X705NA Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X705NA

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	5x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	4x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	3x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	1x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $107Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	1x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	2x
Se HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 17%, 8 samples	2x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16