Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 19:12
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 387
48% 364 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (63 fps cap detected)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 56.5
52% 60.6 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 63.3
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 61 60 57 64 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 460
Write 299
Mixed 316
SusWrite 93.3
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 49
147% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 334
251% 336 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
70GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 95 101 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 92.8
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 98
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
448GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 143 145 145 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 142
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 144
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB
76GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 38.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 40
48% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.6% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,224
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback