Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 15:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 941
84% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31.6
28% 30.6 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 31.8
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 486 334 294 295 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 493
Mixed 460
SusWrite 365
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 62.3
208% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 124%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 205 216 220 219 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 178
Mixed 73
SusWrite 215
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Read 30.8
Write 4.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.3
11% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 29
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback