Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 3620
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 3620 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181107
Uptime	28.2 Days
Run Date	May 30 '19 at 05:43
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 2,081 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 194 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 198 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 19.2 18% 19.2 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 16.1 16% 20.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7m 512GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMM03D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 240 236 239 235 234 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 414 Write 262 Mixed 274 SusWrite 232 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 41.7 141% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 302 223% 297 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 120%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: JB0OA3P0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 128 127 128 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 130 Write 124 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 127 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 75%
Imation Nano Pro 8GB 337 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 063d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.2 7.1 9.4 9.4 9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	7.65% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 7.1 12% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 66% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.65% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 2,345 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 20.1 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 20.9 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	325x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	246x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	205x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	100x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	64x
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples	58x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,345 samples	205x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 3,256 samples	175x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 714 samples	125x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $226

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16