Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 169 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 329 46% 341 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8614) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.13% Terrible	Lighting 9 Reflection 7.88 Parallax 9.16 7% 8.68 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 7.13 7% 8.44 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.13% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme NE-128 128GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: R062 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 178 174 205 25 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 756 Write 404 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 144 73% 336 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 16.6 81% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 94.1 DQ Mixed 19.3 47% 100 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 531%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0 2x4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
RM25664BA1339.8FD Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 RM25664BA1339.8FD Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 12GBUnknownBench 49%, 4 samples	4x
ACR16D3LU1KB KHX1600C9D3/ ACR16D3LU1KB KHX1600C9D3/ 16GBKingstonBench 54%, 4 samples	4x
RM25664BA133 029E VS2GB1333D3 859B RM25664BA133 029E VS2GB1333D3 8GBUnknownBench 47%, 3 samples	3x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $394

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16