PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX (all builds) |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181105 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 02 '19 at 10:26 |
Run Duration | 248 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$459
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 327 474 852 403 362 MB/s
|
219%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung HD103SJ 500GB
53GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 487 489 449 416 297 MB/s
|
||||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
387GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2468 2119 1078 1076 1077 1065 MB/s
|
363%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD1002FAEX-00Z3A0 500GB
294GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 93 91 92 MB/s
|
||||
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B2 1TB
384GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 117 119 115 MB/s
|
||||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
580GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 102 102 103 102 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
|
125%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 175x |
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples | 52x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $459Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 71x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 17x |
Titan X PascalNvidia $286Bench 121%, 8,692 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $909 |