| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120910 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 06 '19 at 12:40 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.5%
Good
|
68% 118 Pts
|
43% 321 Pts
|
20% 321 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
35.4%
Below average
|
38% 43.5 fps
|
31% 38.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 171 165 174 174 205 MB/s
|
37.9%
Below average
|
41% 181 MB/s
|
56% 19.2 MB/s
|
28% 43.9 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
41GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 103 98 99 98 MB/s
|
62%
Good
|
65% 89.7 MB/s
|
127% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.6%
Below average
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
49% 81.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 376 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 62x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 41x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |