Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	11.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 19:17
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 61.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 216 71% 131 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 903 79% 675 Pts	64-Core 2285 141% 2285 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (88^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)	54.3% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 57.9 54% 64.2 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 64.4 Splatting 68 54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 619GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 1343 1347 1340 1357 1353 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	256% Outstanding	Read 1,966 Write 1,946 Mixed 1,550 SusWrite 1,369 384% 1,708 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 66 209% 71.1 MB/s	DQ Read 756 DQ Write 516 DQ Mixed 665 489% 646 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 256% Great: 410%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 475GB free Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1576 1585 1575 1575 1583 1576 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 1844 Write 1,481 Mixed 811 SusWrite 1,578 320% 1,428 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 51.4 176% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 767 DQ Write 606 DQ Mixed 697 519% 690 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 353%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 34GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 57.2 Write 57.3 Mixed 44.8 SusWrite 32.6 36% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 49%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 21GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 47 39 34 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 29.7 Mixed 39 SusWrite 42 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 70.3 Write 18.2 Mixed 0.3 SusWrite 10.2 23% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Mixed 0 47% 4.25 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 22GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.6 1.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.22% Terrible	Read 6 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 1.5 5% 4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 1.22% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 50.3 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 47.7 130% 45.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 18.5 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $143Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16