Zoostorm 7872-0601A

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7872-0601A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK B85M-G
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '19 at 20:08
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 90.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 219 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 400 55% 408 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 79.8 Parallax 69.8 65% 76.4 fps	MRender 72.9 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 74.4 61% 73.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0809 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 177 182 181 192 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 304 Write 183 Mixed 230 SusWrite 174 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 16.1 112% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 55.8 89% 174 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 70%
SanDisk U110 128GB-$69 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 117GB free Firmware: U221000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 86 66 55 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 415 Write 278 Mixed 79 SusWrite 101 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 10.3 44% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 17.6 15% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 143 144 146 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 156 Write 130 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 144 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB 11,058 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.9% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7872-0601A Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

System: Zoostorm 7872-0601A

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	2x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	1x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1311 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 16GBSamsungBench 56%, 3 samples	2x
HMT351U6AFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 46%, 77 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16