Today's hottest deals

Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 10:43
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 99.3
55% 85 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 230
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 265-$105
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 33
23% 30.1 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 35
24% 27.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,730
Write 50.5
Mixed 82
685% 954 MB/s
4K Read 290
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
12,420% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMV8GX3M2A1333C9 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback