Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '19 at 21:03
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 88.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 766 79% 639 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Lighting 60.3 Reflection 56.7 Parallax 50.1 49% 55.7 fps	MRender 46 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 51.2 41% 49.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 159 159 160 159 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 491 Mixed 418 SusWrite 182 89% 399 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 62.1 215% 76.4 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 357 DQ Mixed 359 269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 115%
AMD T00 StoreMI 478GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 323GB free Firmware: 1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 50 19 20 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HX2666CX15D4/4G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB HX2666CX15D4/4G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 35.1 111% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 31 93% 32.6 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	601x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	153x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	117x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	112x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	50x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	113x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	77x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16