Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemMicro-Star PE60 2QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J2  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 03:55
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 93
2-Core 106
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 206
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
MSI(1462 1138) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 15.9
14% 15.7 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 13.4
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 149 141 127 126 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 449
Write 318
Mixed 90
SusWrite 154
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 31.8
117% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 20.1
88% 196 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76%
Great: 97%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
316GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 95 96 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 75
Write 71.7
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 93.7
47% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J2 Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback