PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Sony SVE1513C5E (all builds) |
Motherboard | Sony VAIO |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160926 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 02 '19 at 13:40 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
Sony(104D 90AB) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
4.47%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 450 391 284 284 284 MB/s
|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Disk Name 750GB
529GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Intenso Micro Line 8GB
1GB free, PID 8005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4 4.1 4.1 3.5 3.9 MB/s
|
2.87%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 2x |
Core i7-3632QMIntelBench 61%, 24,912 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $100 |