| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130410 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 02 '19 at 18:59 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.6%
Average
|
38% 52.4 Pts
|
18% 135 Pts
|
9% 151 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
13% 10.3 fps
|
7% 8.61 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
210GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 112 103 102 102 103 MB/s
|
53%
Above average
|
62% 278 MB/s
|
62% 20.3 MB/s
|
143% 202 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 38 35 45 30 38 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
48% 64.7 MB/s
|
52% 0.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
29.2%
Poor
|
28% 9.97 GB/s
|
20% 7.1 GB/s
|
44% 89.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |