Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 148
58% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 621
53% 454 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 81.5
49% 67.9 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 52.1
47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 52 13 58 146 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 432
Write 250
Mixed 305
SusWrite 75.7
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 18
72% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 39.7
42% 72 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
230GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 102 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 58.3
Write 74
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 101
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.6
215% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 114%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
506GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 41.8
Write 77.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 70.9
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 29
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback