| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 9.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170718 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 05 '19 at 18:45 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.5%
Good
|
68% 121 Pts
|
51% 380 Pts
|
23% 377 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
9.9%
Terrible
|
0% 27.8 fps
|
29% 34.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 182 188 183 187 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
65% 293 MB/s
|
135% 49.8 MB/s
|
161% 238 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
777GB free
Firmware: LC15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 111 114 115 115 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
72% 97.8 MB/s
|
156% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
46.9%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
43% 93.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 67x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 64x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 49x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |