Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '19 at 17:25
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 70.4 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 184 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 684 65% 538 Pts	64-Core 1,078 67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 13.6 8% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 9.07 Splatting 16.2 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 263 257 264 262 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 2,047 Write 1,344 Mixed 1,165 SusWrite 292 268% 1,212 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 61 184% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 841 DQ Write 460 DQ Mixed 690 503% 664 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 179GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 407 437 451 451 452 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 461 Mixed 363 SusWrite 421 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 42 156% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 332 258% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 149GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 339 325 315 325 298 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 442 Mixed 301 SusWrite 320 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 79.6 4K Mixed 31.8 122% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 357 DQ Mixed 240 216% 326 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 113%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 622GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 122 120 119 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 126 Write 125 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 119 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 365GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45% Average	Read 98.5 Write 102 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 57.7 57% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169 37,519 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.9% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 18.2 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)