Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 975-$550 3,143 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 95 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 162 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 376 40% 318 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 19.5 18% 19.3 fps	MRender 24.1 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 16.6 17% 21 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 512GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 445GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 82 84 83 82 84 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.7% Average	Read 254 Write 239 Mixed 131 SusWrite 80.9 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 20.1 82% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 53.3 DQ Mixed 92.5 77% 115 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 41GB 466 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	87x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16