Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Memory 45.6 1-Core 15.5 2-Core 26.4 22% 29.2 Pts	4-Core 28.9 8-Core 30.6 4% 29.8 Pts	64-Core 33.4 2% 33.4 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 18 23 14 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 15.7 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 13.8 10% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 41%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 380GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.9% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 20.6 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 22.9 27% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.61% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.1 SC Mixed 0.4 1% 0.2 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.61% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16