Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 09:03
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 135
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 262
33% 251 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 21
Parallax 25.9
17% 22.5 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 22
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 120 106 106 109 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 169
Write 148
Mixed 155
SusWrite 105
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 15
50% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 41.8
41% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 88%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
223GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 160 184 194 204 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 224
Write 217
Mixed 210
SusWrite 189
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 22.5
81% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 43
40% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 5.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $431
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback