Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 U 470 341 User benchmarks, average bench 31% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 40.2 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 50 26% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 64.1 8-Core 72.2 9% 68.1 Pts	64-Core 72.4 4% 72.4 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 907C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.2% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 117 121 119 124 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 162 Write 134 Mixed 138 SusWrite 121 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 12.4 41% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 127 98% 134 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 5.9 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16