Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 19:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 400
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 42
26% 36.2 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 40.7
28% 32.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 308 323 325 301 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 459
Write 344
Mixed 272
SusWrite 308
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 31.6
122% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 64.9
119% 238 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
27GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 93 96 98 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 97.3
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 93.7
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
535GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 108
Write 97.4
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 114
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
167GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 135
Write 39.5
Mixed 21.9
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
292GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 93.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 2
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5 3.3 2.4 2.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 9.8
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 3.4
15% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-002.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback