Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '19 at 11:55
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 87.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 274 91% 166 Pts	4-Core 533 8-Core 529 71% 531 Pts	64-Core 655 40% 655 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3734) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.3% Outstanding	Lighting 105 Reflection 105 Parallax 120 86% 110 fps	MRender 172 Gravity 119 Splatting 96.9 102% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 396GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 906 506 506 503 392 293 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 191 200 180 184 192 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 326 Write 198 Mixed 132 SusWrite 188 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 17.1 79% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 57.2 96% 191 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 179GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 118 172 177 177 177 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 104 Write 72.7 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 162 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.9% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 19.7 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	39x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	28x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	28x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	20x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $502

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16