Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 46.7 1-Core 17.8 2-Core 37.7 24% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 47.3 8-Core 71.1 7% 59.2 Pts	64-Core 69.2 4% 69.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 076F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.47% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 2.22 1% 2.29 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 114 112 117 115 118 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 220 Write 155 Mixed 153 SusWrite 124 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 14.1 51% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 39.4 DQ Mixed 25.5 21% 29 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB 6,155 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.9 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	1x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	1x
9905417-041.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 42%, 25 samples	1x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 6GBKingstonBench 39%, 203 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16