Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-E (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 163 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 326 43% 321 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 40.5 31% 36.4 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 34.3 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80 7,190 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 010 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 446 Write 420 Mixed 170 76% 345 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 37.3 122% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 222 178% 245 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 106GB free Firmware: A3GC SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 48 48 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 98.3 Write 100 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 48.7 55% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 50%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 926GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 188 172 179 186 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 182 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 182 107% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 14GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14.1 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	322x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	258x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	326x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	200x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	175x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	91x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	53x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16